Select country
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Menu
Refine my search

The Apprentice - Can you keep a secret?

Post date: 28/12/2013 | Time to read article: 2 mins

The information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 14/11/2018

By Dr Laura Davison who is a GP in Milton Keynes

Following a number of practice meetings I had some real corkers to tell from the “field” about dilemmas in discretion and confidentiality. I re-read the GMC guidelines on confidentiality to enable me to accurately pass on key points that came of the controversial stories but actually came to the conclusion that...I can’t actually tell you anything. Nothing. Zip. Unless you don’t mind reading a story about Mr X who came to see Dr Y about his disturbing A and Dr Y didn’t know who to ask for help about A just in case B happened and confidentiality had to be broken. Or the other particularly tricky tale about Dr Z constantly complaining about Mr T to Dr M. Dr M knows all about Mr T and wants to help but can’t because it breaches confidentiality of two parties; so instead is putting Mr T and Dr Z through the anxiety-inducing arduousness of P. You see the problem?!

"Providing the care of your patient is paramount but then you have the responsibility to protect the public too"

Disclosing information, even for educational purposes, requires patient consent. You may anonymise cases for reports and no consent would be necessary, but seeing as you know my name, location, occupation and even what I look like, you could probably work out the cases’ identities just through a quick Google if I included too many facts. And what if X, Y and Z read this article too?! Calamity.

The crux of my cases was really a predicament around patients that might be a risk to themselves or others. We discussed a particularly tricky case in one practice meeting. The debate raged on and on until the coffee and sandwiches ran dry. What counts as a “need to know” basis these days? And how do you control the disclosure once it’s ‘out there’ with another party? The old “tap nose, wink wink” approach is no longer effective in secret keeping. There is a huge element of trust versus risk.

"Disclosing information, even for educational purposes, requires patient consent"

The GMC guidance has common themes on information keeping. It’s patient interest versus public interest. Confidentiality is a legal requirement, but for both patient AND public. So which do you pick? Whose side are you on? Providing the care of your patient is paramount but then you have the responsibility to protect the public too. It’s surely a Catch-22. One will not thank you for your decision whichever way you go. It’s eternally debatable. In the end, our practice has chosen to keep our patients’ trust for now. We felt as long as you can justify (and document!) your decision, you should survive these dilemmas with only emotional bruises rather than legal ones.

Is it just me that feels so encumbered by these confidential revelations that patients entrust to me? Can I tell a secret? Should I?

Share this article

Share
Load more reviews
Rating

You've already submitted a review for this item

|
New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again