Complaints in health and social care: standards and guidelines for resolution and learning (2009) aims to provide a simple, consistent approach for staff who handle complaints, and for patients who raise complaints across all health and social care services.
Summary
MPS understands that handling complaints can be complex and stressful. It requires time and commitment during a period when individuals are feeling at their most vulnerable.
The GMC says you must respond promptly, fully and honestly to complaints and apologise where appropriate. Getting it right can pay huge dividends and this factsheet aims to provide you with what you need to know about HSC complaints.
The HSC complaints procedure has two stages
- The first stage is local resolution, where the board tries to resolve the complaint.
- The second stage is where the complaint is not resolved in the hospital and the complainant asks for an independent review by the NI Commissioner for Complaints (the Ombudsman).
Unified system
Broadly speaking, the same complaints procedure applies across all Health and Social Care (HSC) services, including Family Practitioner Services (FPS), HSS Boards, HSC Trusts, Special Agencies, Out of Hours services and HSC prison healthcare to provide ease of access and a speedy, fair and, where possible, local resolution. There are some slight differences with respect to the time frames for responses to a complaint.
The complaints procedure does not cover staff grievances, criminal or coroners’ cases, legal action or disciplinary investigations. It does not cover private care and treatment or services, including private dental care or privately supplied spectacles.
Responsibility for complaints
The Chief Executive should be nominated to manage complaints and, depending on the nature of the complaint, will attempt to resolve the matter to the satisfaction of the complainant.
If a patient does not wish to report the complaint to the organisation’s complaints manager, they can complain to the HSS Board’s complaints manager instead, who should liaise with the HSC organisation’s complaints manager as much as possible.
Publicising the procedure
The complaints procedure should be publicised to your patients so they know about their right to complain, how the procedure works, how to get independent support and advice, and details on how to complain to the Ombudsman.
Who can complain?
A complaint can be made by a patient or person affected, or likely to be affected, by the action or decision of an HSC organisation. A complaint can also be made by someone acting on behalf of the patient or person with their written consent. In the circumstances of a child or someone lacking physical or mental capacity to complain, but who otherwise would have complained, a parent (or someone with parental responsibility) or an appropriate person, respectively, can complain on their behalf.
Receiving and acknowledging complaints
- A complaint should be acknowledged in writing within two working days of receipt.
- The acknowledgment letter should explain the procedure, clarify issues arising from the complaint, and always thank the complainant for drawing the matter to the organisation’s attention. There should be a statement of sympathy or concern over the incident – this is not an admission of liability.
- If a complaint is made verbally, it should be documented and the complainant should be asked to confirm in writing that they agree with what has been recorded.
- There should be co-operation with other organisations if necessary, eg, HSC organisations, regulatory authorities, the Ombudsman, and the Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA).
Learning from complaints
Complaints provide opportunities to improve:
- Outcomes for service users
- The quality of services
- Service user experiences.
Replying to the complainant
- Where possible, complaints should be dealt with immediately.
- Local resolution should be completed within 20 working days of receipt of a complaint and a full response sent.
- The complaints manager should identify those complaints which can be resolved immediately, those that require a formal investigation, and those which should be referred outside the HSC complaints procedure.
The way a response is written, or the way a meeting is conducted, can often be the deciding factor as to whether or not a complaint proceeds further. Sometimes, acknowledging that the person’s feelings of frustration or anger at what happened are real and understandable, regardless of whether the complaint is justified or not, is enough to defuse the situation.
The complaints manager should inform the complainant of the results of the investigation in writing. This should include a detailed account of what happened. It should also include an apology, full explanation of events, lessons learned and reassurance of any changes which might be implemented in the future.
Time limits for making a complaint
Normally a complaint should be made within six months of the incident that caused the problem, or within six months of the complainant discovering the problem – as long as this is not more than one year after the event. However, you can extend the time limits, where it would be unreasonable to expect the complaint to have been made earlier.
Confidentiality issues
You must ensure that the patient has given their written consent before you can disclose clinical information to a third party. It can be a complex matter, particularly if the patient has died, was a child or was an adult without capacity: in such cases we advise you to contact MPS for further advice.
Possible claims for compensation
If you are aware through a complaint that a patient intends to pursue a claim for compensation, please contact MPS as soon as possible – as this is excluded from the HSC complaints procedure, the complaints process should cease. If a complainant later decides not to take legal action, and wishes to pursue their complaint through the complaints process, the investigation of their complaint should commence or resume.
Out of area complaints
If the complainant lives in Northern Ireland and the complaint is about events elsewhere, the HSS Board or HSC Trust that commissioned the service or purchased the care for that service user is responsible for co-ordinating the investigation and ensuring that all aspects of the complaint are investigated.
Locums or doctors in training
Complaints against locums or doctors in training should be investigated by the board and, if they have left the board, the doctors concerned contacted, if possible, for their comments.
Keeping records
A separate file must be kept for complaints records; these should not be included in the patient’s medical records. Clear and accurate documentation is essential for complaints handling. In cases where a complaint has been resolved by local resolution, records of complaints should be kept for ten years. This should include copies of all correspondence between the complainant and the HSC, but not draft documentation, unless you are prepared for the possibility that this might be disclosed in the future.
Conciliation
You may wish to consider using a conciliation service, or independent advocates or experts, to facilitate a discussion or meeting. The HSC Board will act as an “honest broker” where requested to try to restore trust between a patient and the HSC organisation. Please contact your local board for further information.
HSC complaints procedure – the Northern Ireland Commissioner for Complaints (the Ombudsman)
Most complaints are resolved at a local level. However, in some cases the complainant may not be satisfied and may ask the NI Commissioner for Complaints (the Ombudsman) to investigate their complaint.
Complainants must be advised of their right to refer their complaint to the Ombudsman. You must tell complainants that they should contact the Ombudsman no later than 12 months after the event they are complaining about. In any case where the complaints manager does not investigate a complaint on the grounds that it was not made within the time limit, the complainant can request the Ombudsman to consider it.
Unhappiness about the outcome of the complaints process is not sufficient cause for the Ombudsman to investigate; complainants will need to provide reasons why they are still dissatisfied and consider whether or not they have suffered hardship or injustice. The Ombudsman does not investigate all cases.
Further information