Over the year that followed, guided and supported by my Medical Protection team, I went on a reflective journey that didn’t just educate me, it changed me. It enabled me to see the root cause of the dishonesty: high levels of stress and upset, coupled with fear-based prideI really needed that job, and a driving factor was being able to support my mum and dad. But at the same time, there’s a lot of status attached to the academic side of medicine, and I was chasing this to feel better about myself, and more in control.
I’m not trying to excuse the things I did, but as a cardiothoracic surgeon, my field is competitive and challenging, and I also come from a competitive and challenging background. My parents wanted so much more for me than they’d had themselves. I am their only child, and they always pushed me hard to achieve. Their expectations, and the standards I set myself, were sky high.
Certainly, my mental health at the time of the dishonesty was not good. On top of work stress, my mum’s need for constant care was hard on me and my husband, and it was heartbreaking to see my dad in distress almost every day.
But as I said, nothing excuses my behaviour. The GMC is very clear on this: research must be honest and transparent. My academic efforts during those two years were anything but.
During the year I was suspended, I undertook more than 20 professional development courses. Medical Protection’s courses relating to professional ethics and integrity were particularly valuable. I saw my therapist every week, and as the months went on, I was able to understand my damaging thoughts and behaviour and ultimately overcome them. There was a lot of homework in between the sessions, and based on this my therapist helped me to prepare the reflective statement required by the tribunal review.
To my immense gratitude, the review panel no longer considered that my fitness to practise was impaired, and I was able to return to work without restrictions.