Select location
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Menu
Refine my search

Good records in a worst-case scenario

Post date: 08/06/2021 | Time to read article: 3 mins

The information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 07/07/2021


By Dr Andrew Bickle


Mrs Q was a 29-year-old new mother of a 2-month-old baby daughter. She had an established history from the age of 21 of recurrent depressive disorder without psychotic symptoms. The management of two previous episodes had been shared between secondary psychiatric outpatient services and her GP. Her last episode, which had occurred three years previously after a miscarriage, was associated with fleeting suicidal ideation and she was briefly admitted as a voluntary patient. Between episodes she made a good functional recovery and had a successful career as a legal secretary. Unfortunately, her relationship with her husband was strained. While the new baby was welcomed, it further highlighted the difficulties around the husband working away from home in the week in his role as an account manager. Mrs Q’s family lived locally and she had a supportive relationship with her elder sister who was a housewife. 

Late one Wednesday evening she was brought to the emergency medicine department by her sister, in whom she had confided that she was experiencing intrusive, upsetting thoughts of killing herself by jumping from a motorway bridge. She knew this was wrong and felt extremely guilty towards her baby whom she loved. She had been feeling low ever since the birth, but in the last three weeks she had felt this way all day and nothing brought her any pleasure at all. She was admitted to an acute psychiatric ward for four days and then on to her local sector treatment ward. She agreed she needed to be somewhere safe and came in voluntarily. Her GP had recently started a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant and this was continued, along with a long-acting benzodiazepine for agitation, which she was given on a few occasions. Her rapport with staff was good and her mental state was recorded frequently by medical and nursing staff. She had regular 1:1 sessions with her named nurse which she reported as being helpful.

After a couple of days she disclosed no further suicidal ideation, but persistent biological symptoms including insomnia and anergia impaired her ability to function independently so her admission continued for another couple of weeks. During this time her baby was being cared for by her sister, to the satisfaction of Mrs Q who didn’t want her daughter brought into hospital. As Mrs Q’s energy returned she went on increasing periods of unescorted leave to her sister’s house. Careful recordings of her mental state with appropriate risk assessments were made before and after each leave and Mrs Q always returned at the agreed time. She wasn’t suffering any side effects from the pharmacological treatment given to her. The social worker contacted her sister who confirmed that the leave periods were going well and, in her view, her sister was getting better.

In the third week, Mrs Q went on a fourth period of leave, but failed to return. Ward staff called her sister who said she had left her house hours earlier at the appointed time. Later that day Mrs Q jumped to her death from a multi-storey car park. 

Subsequently, there was an inquest, an internal hospital inquiry and an independent homicide inquiry, all of which received considerable media attention. Medical Protection was able to provide medicolegal support to our members at each stage. The high quality of the medical records was invaluable – demonstrating the level of care which had been given.

However, Mrs Q’s husband made a claim against the hospital and the consultant psychiatrist for failing to provide good care and not preventing her suicide. The case was defended based on the quality of the healthcare record, where every step was reflected upon and every decision explained. The case duly went to trial and the judge found in favour of the defendants.
 

Learning points

  • As with any other mental disorder, multidisciplinary interventions are required to provide appropriate management of patients with depression, as was provided in this case.
  • Risks can never be eradicated even with best practice, only reduced. Good record keeping helps to maintain best practice with clear communication between professionals and demonstrates that best practice has taken place.
  • Appropriate record keeping is recognised as an important component of professional standards and assists healthcare professions to give a logical account when their decision-making is called into question.
 
 

Share this article

Share
Load more reviews
Rating

You've already submitted a review for this item

|
New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again