Select location
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Refine my search

Another diabetic death

Post date: 01/02/2005 | Time to read article: 2 mins

The information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 14/11/2018

Miss T suffered from schizophrenia and lived in a hostel near Dr U’s surgery in Africa. She had been generally unwell for two months and visited Dr U on several occasions.

One day, a care worker from the hostel telephoned the surgery and told the practice nurse that she was worried about Miss T, who had been complaining of an upset stomach, weight loss, generalised weakness and excessive thirst. Miss T visited the surgery later that day and Dr U took blood for haemoglobin levels and a stool sample to be tested for hookworm.

Three days later, the staff at the hostel were still concerned about Miss T’s state of health and they asked Dr U to come and see her. Dr U attended and recommended that Miss T be taken to the emergency psychiatric clinic, as it was his opinion that her symptoms were psychosomatic in origin.

Miss T arrived at the psychiatric clinic later that day. She was seen by a junior doctor, who arranged an immediate transfer to the emergency department. By the time Miss T arrived at the hospital she was unrousable. The notes recorded a pulse rate of 101 bpm, BM stix Hi-Hi, respiratory rate of 32 and ++ ketones in the urine.

Attempts to stabilise her were unsuccessful; eight days later, Miss T suffered a cardiac arrest and died.

A claim was brought against Dr U, alleging that Miss T had presented with classic symptoms of diabetes mellitus and that Dr U should have considered this as a differential diagnosis.

The question of whether Dr U delivered a sub-standard level of care hinged upon his visit to Miss T at her hostel.

Expert opinion

The GP expert we consulted felt that he had not examined her thoroughly enough. It was more than likely that ‘her symptoms and physical signs, at this time, were compatible with a diagnosis of acute diabetes mellitus. That being the case, the more appropriate referral would have been to a general medical bed.’

He concluded that Dr U would be vulnerable to a finding of breach of duty based on his management of Miss T at that time. We therefore decided to seek a settlement to the case.

Learning points

Patients with longstanding chronic conditions do also develop new disorders. These may often be masked by the existing condition, which makes it difficult to recognise them.

Particularly vulnerable are patients with mental health problems and prisoners. While it is true that new symptoms in such patients can often be manifestations of psychological problems or manipulation, no such conclusions should be drawn until adequate steps have been taken to exclude an organic cause.

See the Royal College of Psychiatry’s 2001 report, Mental Illness: Stigmatisation and Discrimination Within the Medical Profession.

Share this article

Load more reviews

You've already submitted a review for this item

New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again