Select location
Membership information
0800 561 9000
Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Menu
Refine my search

A problem with the system, not the patient

Post date: 01/01/2007 | Time to read article: 2 mins

The information within this article was correct at the time of publishing. Last updated 14/11/2018

Mr C, a 47-year-old self-employed electrician, was admitted for a routine arthroscopic menisectomy of the knee. He was in good health and did not take any regular medication. His past medical history was unremarkable. He was keen to resume his active lifestyle, and return to work as soon as possible since he was the sole breadwinner. Preoperative assessment confirmed that he was healthy and fit for the procedure.

He was listed to undergo surgery as a day case. The anaesthetist failed to carry out any checks of the anaesthetic equipment, either in the anaesthetic room or in the operating theatre.

The induction of anaesthesia was straightforward. The airway was easily secured with spontaneous ventilation through a laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia was maintained with a mixture of isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen. An opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory were administered to provide suitable analgesia.

About 20 minutes into surgery, the anaesthetist noticed that the oxygen saturation had fallen from 98% to 46%. Simultaneously, the heart rate fell from 64 to 30.The patient’s colour had turned dusky and his pulse was slow and weak. A rapid assessment of the airway confirmed that it was still patent.

The anaesthetist was unable to find an immediate cause, and increased the oxygen concentration to 100% with no improvement in the saturation.

He administered 0.6mg of atropine as well. The heart rate increased to 100 beats per minute.

The saturation, however, remained low. The anaesthetist then conducted a check of the entire anaesthetic breathing circuit and anaesthetic machine.

He found a leak in the circle breathing system. This was replaced and the oxygen saturation gradually returned to 96%. The rest of the procedure was uneventful. Return of consciousness was delayed, and it soon became apparent that the patient had suffered a hypoxic brain injury.

Subsequent neurological assessment confirmed that the patient had suffered a significant hypoxic brain injury with no prospect of a return to his former activities. He was unable to return to his livelihood and required fulltime care.

Expert opinion

A consultant anaesthetist provided an expert opinion about the standard of care provided by the anaesthetist. He concluded that there had been a glaring failure to check the anaesthetic machine and equipment prior to administering the anaesthetic.

The expert felt that the fault in the breathing circuit would have been apparent from the outset had the machine been checked. Subsequent events might then have been avoided. He was also critical of the immediate management of the bradycardia in the presence of the severe hypoxaemia. He felt that more attention should have been given to searching for a cause of the bradycardia; in this case it was hypoxaemia.

His conclusions were that the standard of care fell short of what might have been reasonably expected. The case was indefensible, and was settled for a substantial amount.

Learning points

  • It is mandatory to carry out a proper check of the anaesthetic machine, equipment and monitoring equipment prior to their use. A major contributory factor to hypoxic brain injury during anaesthesia has been the use of equipment and breathing circuits that had not been checked by the anaesthetist.
  • A record of the check should be kept.
  • A local policy should be in place to ensure that anaesthetists are well acquainted with the anaesthetic equipment they are using and the checking procedure.
  • There are several well-known causes of bradycardia under anaesthesia. These include drugs and certain surgical stimuli. In the absence of any other obvious immediate cause for a sudden bradycardia during anaesthesia, hypoxaemia should always be foremost in the differential diagnosis. Bradycardia is a late manifestation of hypoxaemia in adults. Urgent efforts should be directed to finding and correcting the immediate cause of the hypoxaemia.

Further information

The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) has published a guidelines booklet entitled Checking Anaesthetic Equipment (2004).

The AAGBI has also produced Checklist for Anaesthetic Equipment 2004. This is available in A4 laminated format for attachment to all anaesthetic machines.

Both at www.aagbi.org.

The Royal College of Anaesthetists requires trainees to demonstrate competency in checking the equipment as part of their assessment. www.rcoa.ac.uk

Share this article

Share
Load more reviews
Rating

You've already submitted a review for this item

|
New site feature tour

Introducing an improved
online experience

You'll notice a few things have changed on our website. After asking our members what they want in an online platform, we've made it easier to access our membership benefits and created a more personalised user experience.

Why not take our quick 60-second tour? We'll show you how it all works and it should only take a minute.

Take the tour Continue to site

Medicolegal advice
0800 561 9090
Membership information
0800 561 9000

Key contact details

Should you need to contact us, our phone numbers are always visible.

Personalise your search

We'll save your profession in the "I am a..." dropdown filter for next time.

Tour completed

Now you've seen all of the updated features, it's time for you to try them out.

Continue to site
Take again