In “Back with back pain”, Mrs S’s recurrent urine infections, in association with back pain, were found to be co-existing with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Despite a claim being made against Dr F for failing to refer Mrs S earlier, Dr F’s good documentation of the history and each examination meant that this was discontinued. Experts found that there was a careful, well-documented assessment of Mrs S on every occasion, which showed that at no time was an emergency referral warranted.
In direct contrast, a claim against Dr W for a missed SAH in “Take me seriously” had to be settled for a high sum. There was no evidence in the records that Dr W had taken any history or performed an examination. As a result, Mrs T’s fatal SAH was missed. One consultation was recorded simply as "Migraine. Prescribed some painkillers.” Despite Mrs T returning to the surgery several times with recurrent headaches, and later with pain shooting down the back of her neck, the potentially life-threatening causes of her recurrent headaches were not considered.
Similarly, in “Where the heart is”, Mr R’s high blood pressure was attributed to anxiety before more sinister pathologies were excluded. His risk factors for cardiopulmonary disease should have been considered when taking the history, examining and arranging follow up tests.
The learning points from all these cases are that potentially serious pathologies should never be discounted before a proper assessment has been made and a detailed history taken. Comprehensive records should be made of both.