Membership information 0800 561 9000
Medicolegal advice 0800 561 9090

The accused

Public exposure from complaints and claims can cause doctors to face a trial by media. In 2011, a UK GP was accused of sexually motivated conduct when he examined a patient’s chest – he shares his experience with Sara Dawson

It seemed like a normal surgery day a couple of years ago. As I was signing scripts, my practice manager knocked on my door and brought in a brown envelope marked private and confidential. I opened it and read it – the contents were highly distressing.

The letter contained details of allegations made by a female patient (Mrs B) that, two months previously, I had conducted a sexually motivated consultation. I remember seeing Mrs B in early spring complaining of chest and stomach pain. Initially I offered her a chaperone, as it is practice policy; she declined, so I performed a thorough chest examination and referred her for surgery.

Her complaint was that during the chest examination I squeezed her breast, and behaved sexually while breathing heavily. She thought my front, back and side examination was inappropriate and not what she’d expected. 

I was devastated to hear about the serious nature of the complaint, as it would have ramifications for me, as a doctor, and as a husband and a father, and as an upstanding member of society. My surgery staff were highly distressed and took it very seriously; I immediately contacted Medical Protection.

Investigation

We asked the patient to give consent so that we could send the complaint to be investigated thoroughly and in an unbiased way by the PCT (Primary Care Trust).1 After a delay, the records were shared and I gave my witness statement. The local PCT determined that I should have a chaperone for every female consultation while the investigation was underway.

In spite of numerous attempts, Mrs B failed to engage with the PCT to give her version of events. The PCT felt they had no choice but to refer the case to the General Medical Council (GMC). The GMC held an interim order panel meeting. Accompanied by an Medical Protection solicitor, the panel listened to our case. They applied conditions to my registration that I was to have a chaperone for every intimate female examination, and to log each examination. The GMC’s investigation took more than a year to complete and a hearing date was set, 18 months after the initial allegation.

The hearing

The first day of the hearing didn’t go to plan. I arrived all geared up to defend my corner, but Mrs B did not turn up, so it was adjourned until the following day. When the hearing did commence Mrs B gave a witness statement, and there was a submission from my Medical Protection-instructed barrister, then the panel went away to decide the next course of action.

The next day the panel gave their decision that they found the allegation untrustworthy and uncorroborated, and the case was concluded.

Personal impact

The experience of having a patient make an unfounded allegation against you is devastating; I would not wish it on my worst enemy. The insecurity you feel day in and day out is worse than physical pain. There were days where I could not see any light at the end of the tunnel, like my head was under a guillotine. My mind was fractured; I kept thinking ‘why me, why did this happen to me?’

As a doctor this experience was earth-shattering: it’s the worst thing to be accused of – an allegation of sexual motivation; how can you prove you were acting appropriately? It’s their word against yours. If the GMC had found in Mrs B’s favour, my license, my livelihood, my marriage, my social standing would have been demolished just like that. 

During the investigation I went to work as normal. Every day I had to face the stigma around me of what I had allegedly done.

Impact on the practice

It was particularly hard on the practice, having to have a chaperone from beginning to end. We were not just employing a GP, but two healthcare professionals at the same time. This had huge financial and logistical implications for the practice. Not being a big practice we don’t have many nurses or staff, so it was difficult. We had to consider the future of the business: if I were to be found guilty and forced to leave, how would the practice cope?

We had to consider the future of the business: if I were to be found guilty and forced to leave, how would the practice cope?

Media coverage

Handling the media was not something I’d really considered. I’d definitely never thought about being on the front page of a national newspaper. We were all worried about it: what would patients do? The stories were angled in a certain way that assumed I was guilty – it would have been nice to be captioned in a different way.

I remember, during the hearing, getting messages from friends asking if I was ok, as they’d seen the coverage. Even abroad, it was all over the internet. The pressure was huge and so upsetting. My name was exposed, I’d lost my anonymity – I was breakfast gossip. There was a sense of bias – why was I stripped of my anonymity when the person who made the allegations enjoyed full anonymity? The media coverage added salt to my wounds.

Support

Throughout the process I worked closely with the local medical committee, my Medical Protection legal team, and the PCT. Without the understanding and professionalism of these people it would have been a much more difficult time. I drew strength from the fact that I knew I was professional and hadn’t done anything wrong – I believed the truth would come out in the end. I’m most proud of the way the practice dealt with the whole thing – we pulled together like a family.

From the first day, I was honest about the allegation and discussed it with my staff, my patients, my family and my colleagues; from then on I informed them of all the developments. I could not have survived the experience if they hadn’t supported me. I always wanted to be a professional GP, dedicated to my practice and patients, and to be involved in the community as a doctor.

Eighteen months have been wiped from my life and I will never get answers to why Mrs B did what she did, but I take some comfort in that justice has been done and I was vindicated – life goes on and I have learnt from it.

 
Names have been withheld to protect the confidentiality of those involved.
  

Download a PDF of this edition
References
  1. Note for readers outside England: Primary Care Trusts were administrative bodies within the National Health Service (NHS), responsible for commissioning primary, community and secondary health services from providers, and for providing funding to GPs. They were abolished in 2013.
7 comments
  • By Noor on 20 July 2016 10:36

    In the interest of justice and fair play, like in other similar areas of allegations, could we not now look into counter-suing defamation libel or character assassination is ultimately unfounded.

    if not, why shouldn't we?

  • By Richard Brown on 20 July 2016 09:24

    A sorry tale, that reflects poorly on the GMC. The GP shouldn't have been subjected to any of it. Patients can, for whatever reason & without fear of repercussion, create mayhem which the GMC seemingly relish by actively publicising cases even when the doctor is innocent. The GMC is woefully slow, utterly distinterested in the devastating effects they have on people's lives & we have to pay through the nose to maintain them.

    I hope this GP & his family are all ok & have managed to get life back on track again.

  • By Dr Iain Ashworth on 20 July 2016 06:27 Did the doctor sue the patient for damages? Mischievous allegations produce great suffering and potential damage to the doctor and his reputation . A patient shouldn't be allowed to perpetrate such an act without some form of prosecution. Such a fraudulent persecution of an innocent professional needs to be dealt with criminally, in my opinion. 
  • By L Hughes on 19 July 2016 09:50 Absolutely disgusting that the media did this to you.  Anonymity should be maintained for both parties.  Thank you for sharing such a difficult experience. 
  • By Dr John Etherton on 19 July 2016 09:25

    An excellent and dispassionate account, and I am extremely sorry to read this story. I appeared in a County Court on behalf of a colleague a while ago to provide a character testimonial for my colleague in a very similar case. The one contribution I wish to make to this tale of horror is that, like my colleague, a chaperone was not used for an intimate examination as the patient declined, and it goes without saying - and as a caution to the whole profession, that "no chaperone, no examination". I rest my case, and best wishes to our colleague whose story is the subject of this entry.

  • By Dr Nick McD. on 19 July 2016 05:31 Outrageous - the ordeal he was put through
  • By annonymous on 19 July 2016 04:54

      Bodies like MPS should fight the system that in such cases doctor thru bodies like MPS should be able to

      take such patients to courts for liable

    Leave a comment