Membership information 1800 932 916
Medicolegal advice 1800 936 077

Problems in clinical management

Negligence is a legal concept. It does not mean neglect or wilful misconduct, but a failure to attain a reasonable standard of care. Any doctor can make an error of judgment. Some are legally defensible, others are not; what is important is whether the management can be defended by a responsible body of professional opinion.

In cases of negligence, the only remedy available in law is financial compensation: damages are paid to restore claimants to the position they would have been in had the negligent act not occurred. Before damages are payable, however, the claimant must prove all three of the following:

  • They were owed a duty of care.
  • There was a breach of that duty of care.
  • Damage was suffered as a result.
Any doctor can make an error of judgment. Some are legally defensible, others are not; what is important is whether the management can be defended by a responsible body of professional opinion

Clinical practice

The test for establishing negligence in a patient’s diagnosis or treatment derives from the Dunne case,9 in which Finlay CJ set out the principles that courts have since applied when assessing the standard of care the patient received. The first of his principles provides the basis for all the rest; in essence, it states that a doctor should not be considered guilty of medical negligence if other doctors of equal experience in the same specialty would have followed the same practice; such a practice must, however, be rational and reasonable.

Evidence-based guidelines improve the quality of clinical decisions, help replace outdated practices, and provide benchmarks for clinical audit

Adopt accepted practice

Accepted practice is easy to define in some areas – prescribing in accordance with the recommendations of the Irish Medicines Formulary is an obvious example. Increasingly, proper practice has to be based on evidence (ie, determined by systematic methods based on literature review, critical appraisal, multidisciplinary consultation and grading of recommendations by strength of evidence). See Appendix 1 for links to evidence-based websites.

Accepted methods of investigation and treatment are often described by clinical guidelines. Such evidence-based guidelines improve the quality of clinical decisions, help replace outdated practices, and provide benchmarks for clinical audit.

Guidelines are supposed to be an aid to clinical judgment, not a substitute for them. In theory, then, you may choose to exercise your discretion by deciding not to follow a particular guideline. In reality, however, you should only deviate from the accepted practice embodied in the guidelines if you have very good reasons for doing so. If your judgment is called into question, you will have to demonstrate why you were justified in not complying with the guidelines.

Conversely, if you follow respectable clinical guidelines and base your decisions on evidence, you will be in a very strong position if a complaint is made against you.

Act within your limitations 

Although you are not expected to be infallible, the law expects that, as a doctor, you exercise a reasonable standard of skill and care at all times. Never undertake a task that is beyond your competence – when in doubt, seek help from a more experienced colleague.

Ensure you have sufficient help and equipment available for any procedure you undertake, and for the management of all foreseeable complications.

Never undertake a task that is beyond your competence – when in doubt, seek help from a more experienced colleague

Keep up to date

Make Continuing Professional Development (CPD) an integral part of your working life. This not only means keeping up to date with new treatments and technologies, but also requires self-reflection and the expansion and honing of your skills, understanding and knowledge-base.

CPD is a mandatory requirement of registration. All registered medical practitioners are required by the Medical Council to be registered with a Competence Assurance Scheme and to acquire at least 50 CPD credits each year.

Box 9: Defining poor performance

“Poor professional performance, in relation to a medical practitioner, means a failure by the practitioner to meet the standards of competence (whether in knowledge and skill or the application of knowledge and skill or both) that can reasonably be expected of medical practitioners practising medicine of the kind practised by the practitioner.”

Source: Medical Council, Guide to Professional Conduct and Ethics for Registered Medical Practitioners (2009)

Take responsibility for your health

If you have an illness, disability or infection that may put patients at risk, you must seek medical advice and, if necessary, stop or reduce your practice. The safety of your patients should be your prime concern.

The safety of your patients should be your prime concern

Check equipment

Be fully conversant with any equipment you use – ensure that it has been properly serviced and is in working order before beginning any procedure.

Delegate appropriately

In the context of multidisciplinary and cross-agency teamwork, it can be difficult to distinguish between delegation and shared responsibility. The question is really one of accountability, and working in a team doesn’t relieve you of your personal accountability for your professional conduct and standard of care.

As a member of a clinical team, you will have responsibilities for the care of patients, some of which you might delegate to staff who do not belong to a registered professional organisation. In these circumstances you would be held accountable for the actions of those staff members, so you must satisfy yourself that they are competent to take on the duties you are delegating to them and supervise them if necessary.

The matter is a little different when you delegate to a professional colleague. You would not be held accountable for the actions of another registered professional, but you would still be expected to delegate appropriately (ie, to a colleague with relevant training and skills) and to have provided them with sufficient information to carry out the task assigned to them.

Working in a team doesn’t relieve you of your personal accountability for your professional conduct and standard of care

Keep comprehensive up-to-date records

The medical record is an essential component of patient care. A good medical record will contain all the information one clinician needs to take over where another left off – or, to put it another way, to allow a clinician to reconstruct a consultation or patient contact without relying on memory.

It should, therefore, provide all the information a newcomer to the care team would need to know about a patient and their treatment plan.

If you ever need to alter the notes at a later date, make it clear that you are introducing a retrospective correction. Any alteration to paper records should be clearly dated and signed. Do not obliterate the original entry – just run a line through it. Never try to rewrite notes at a later date. Do not delete entries in computer records, but add annotations to them if necessary (and date and initial them if the software doesn’t do it automatically).

If you ever need to alter the notes at a later date, make it clear that you are introducing a retrospective correction
Do not write derogatory statements or criticisms about patients, colleagues or others; be as objective and factual as you can in making your notes. If you record any history provided by someone other than the patient, make sure you include the source – eg, “Has been ‘confused lately’ (daughter)”. Remember, patients have a legal right of access to their records, which can also be scrutinised by the courts.
Patients have a legal right of access to their records, which can also be scrutinised by the courts
The Academy of Royal Medical Colleges has adopted a national standard for notekeeping in the UK (see Box 10).10 Many of the standards are concerned with the structure of case files, and aimed at hospital medical records administration, but the standards concerned with content provide valuable guidance for doctors. Part 2 – A Clinician’s Guide to Record Standards, contains detailed advice about what to document when clerking, handing over care and writing discharge summaries.

The information can be downloaded from the Royal College of Physicians website –www.rcplondon.ac.uk.

Box 10: Selected Generic Record Keeping Standards

  • Entries to the medical record should be made as soon as possible after the event to be documented
  • Every page in the medical record should include the patient’s name, identification number ... and location in the hospital.
  • Every entry in the medical record should be dated, timed (24 hour clock), legible and signed by the person making the entry. The name and designation of the person making the entry should be legibly printed against their signature. Deletions and alterations should be countersigned, dated and timed.
  • Entries to the medical record should be made as soon as possible after the event to be documented (eg. change in clinical state, ward round, investigation) and before the relevant staff member goes off duty. If there is a delay, the time of the event and the delay should be recorded.
  • Every entry in the medical record should identify the most senior healthcare professional present (who is responsible for decision making) at the time the entry is made.
  • An entry should be made in the medical record whenever a patient is seen by a doctor. When there is no entry in the hospital record for more than four (4) days for acute medical care or seven (7) days for long-stay continuing care, the next entry should explain why.
  • The discharge record/discharge summary should be commenced at the time a patient is admitted to hospital.
  • Advance Decisions to Refuse Treatment, Consent, Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation decisions must be clearly recorded in the medical record. In circumstances where the patient is not the decision maker, that person should be identified.

Source: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, A Clinician’s Guide to Record Standards Part 2: Standards for the Structure and Content of Medical Records and Communications when Patients are Admitted to Hospital (2008)